- The aim of argument that should’ve been used was they should’ve tried to persuade each other more with each other
2. this is my answer because they didn’t spend a lot of time arguing over who’s right and didn’t seem to be giving each really wrong points on the taxes up until the end
3. The were just rambling about what they believed in. No pauses to address certain points they just gave one side then went with the other side
4. they didn’t have a constructive argument, it was plain and wasn’t even really an argument. Gave one side, gave the other side, and then concluded that the talk never happened. They ended up getting sidetracked while talking because they didn’t focus on the topic and it changed the entire purpose of it
5. These new criteria can help me by making my arguments more argumentative. Have them be more open changes rather than just having a personalized thought
Jasons Blog 